Category: Legal Dilemmas

5 Common Myths About USA Gun Laws

There are many myths out there about gun laws in the United States and the fact is that many people still believe these myths. Owning a gun is an important responsibility, and you want to know the right information. Here are five of the most common myths about our gun laws.

To be clear, many gun laws in America change due to who is in power in the government at any given time. Furthermore, gun laws differ across the country so it’s best to consult certified professionals or the relevant authorities in your state to get more specific information that applies to your situation.

Myths with American Gun Laws

1) The first myth of gun laws in the USA is that people with a criminal background are automatically barred from owning a gun. In reality, this is not true. Criminal background checks do not necessarily exclude anyone from owning a gun, but they can make it more difficult. In reality, it’s not true that anyone with a criminal background can’t own a gun.

2) The second myth of gun laws is that if you have a felony on your record you will be denied a gun. That may seem hard to believe, but it is not true. Anyone who has been convicted of a crime, or who has a felony on their record, will be asked for a criminal background check before getting a gun license. This includes people with misdemeanor convictions. However, a mentioned previously, USA gun laws vary by state so there are some states where these checks are not required to apply for a gun license.

3) The third myth with gun laws in America is that if you haven’t taken a course you will automatically be denied a gun license. Again, this is not true. To get a license you must be at least 21 years old, pass a background check, be a citizen of the United States, and be a legal resident of the state in which you are applying. There are thousands of people who have received gun licenses despite having no formal training.

4) The fourth myth with gun laws in America is that people in safe neighborhoods cannot buy guns. This myth is also false. While it’s unlikely that they will need to use a gun, this does not mean that they can’t get a gun, nor does it mean that they will automatically be denied the license. You will simply need to present a compelling reason for your need to own a gun.

5) Finally, the fifth gun law myth is that individuals can be denied a gun license if they have previously been arrested for a drug charge even if it wasn’t a felony. Again, this is not true. USA gun laws vary by state

There are indeed some states that prohibit certain groups of people from getting a gun license.


As you can see, these are the five major myths about gun laws in the United States. Unfortunately, many individuals refuse to believe the things that are true try to make their life harder than it already is. These people should be educated, they should be made aware of the facts. Therefore, it is up to us, to tell the truth about these things, but we also need to be vigilant enough to make sure that we do not fall victim to these myths ourselves.…

Ethical And Legal Dilemmas Of The New Era

The new era already has many names: the era of perplexity, the era of uncertainty, the era of complexity, and many others. They are all true and incomplete. All of them must compel us to take more seriously the risks that are being generated for the rights of citizens and as a whole for the human condition.

The world of law is accumulating many new obligations to which it will have to respond with ingenuity, talent, agility, and flexibility if it does not want to lose its leading role in an insecure and bewildered society in the face of the profound changes that are generating an authentic new reality. And it will not be an easy task.

  • All technological and scientific advances have legal implications. Our establishment cannot turn its back on this reality.
  • Citizens as a whole are not aware of how these advances can affect their specific rights and the current structure and structure of society. The right to privacy and privacy – and this is not the only example – is being diluted without any effective reaction. Even more sensitive issues may be in question and at risk.
  • The scientific world, with the determined support of the legal world, has to become closer to the citizen and promote a more constant and more committed media disclosure about the effects of its research and discoveries.
  • The political world also has a duty to be aware of these new realities and open debate both on the impact on the pension system and on the changes and risks that could be generated in many other fields. They cannot continue to be isolated in a ghetto, always operating in the short term due to electoral pressure.
  • In all these tasks and duties, it will be vital to organize multidisciplinary meetings in which scientists and technologists participate to educate and guide us in the new processes and the foreseeable implications. From a fixed and one-dimensional mind, it is impossible to understand such complex problems and therefore seeks the appropriate solutions.
  • The legal world is not the only factor or the key factor in this process, but it cannot give up having a special role as a body to which it corresponds to regulate, through the law, citizen coexistence by giving each one his or her own.
  • The legal world must prepare itself, not to control or limit scientific and technological advances, –a task that is impossible,– but to know them in-depth and foresee –a task that is not impossible, but extremely difficult– their consequences in terms of basic rights and the legal order as a whole.

Legal journals have been published for a long time on all the aforementioned topics ( Robotic Law Journal, Biology and Law, and others) and there are countless essays and articles on the impact that artificial intelligence can have on the legal activity as a whole and specifically about the dangers that can be generated.